Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, wenjing@gmail.com, Andrew Bille <andrewbille@gmail.com>, Tony Zhu <Tony.zhu@ww-it.cn>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-03T21:07:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
PageAddItemExtended(): Add LP_UNUSED assertion.
- 30aaab26e521 14.0 cited
-
Remove temporary files after backend crash
- cd91de0d1795 14.0 cited
-
Fix comment in indexing.c
- 9fd2952cf492 14.0 cited
-
Fix failure to ignore leftover temp tables after a server crash.
- 6919b7e32947 9.3.0 cited
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:29 PM Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote: > I'm still hopeful we get to advance this early in 16 because I think > everyone agrees the feature would be great. I'm not saying this patch can't make progress, but I think the chances of this being ready to commit any time in the v16 release cycle, let alone at the beginning, are low. This patch set has been around since 2019, and here Andres and I are saying it's not even really reviewable in the shape that it's in. I have done some review of it previously, BTW, but eventually I gave up because it just didn't seem like we were making any progress. And then a long time after that people were still finding many server crashes with relatively simple test cases. I agree that the feature is desirable, but I think getting there is going to require a huge amount of effort that may amount to a total rewrite of the patch. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com