Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-03-01T18:28:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Wakeup WALWriter as needed for asynchronous commit performance.
- 4de82f7d7c50 9.2.0 cited
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> And how would a DBA know that? >> >> We'd add a column to pg_class that tracks which page version is in use >> for each relation. > > So a relation can't have some pages in Version 9.2, and other pages in > version 9.3? How will this work for 2TB tables? Not very well, but better than Tom's proposal to require upgrading the entire cluster in a single off-line operation. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company