Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>,
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
"tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com" <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>,
"andres@anarazel.de" <andres@anarazel.de>, "magnus@hagander.net" <magnus@hagander.net>, "mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com" <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>,
"don@seiler.us" <don@seiler.us>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-09-23T16:57:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:53 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > I am not sure either as that's a tradeoff between an underestimation > and no information. The argument of consistency indeed matters. > Let's see if others have any opinion to share on this point. Well, if we think the information won't be safe to use, it's better to report nothing than a wrong value, I think. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Silence extra logging when using "postgres -C" on runtime-computed GUCs
- 8bbf8461a3a2 15.0 landed
-
doc: Improve postgres command for shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages
- bbd4951b73ec 15.0 landed
-
Introduce GUC shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages
- 43c1c4f65eab 15.0 landed
-
Support "postgres -C" with runtime-computed GUCs
- 0c39c292077e 15.0 landed
-
Make shared_memory_size a preset option
- 3b231596ccfc 15.0 landed
-
Introduce GUC shared_memory_size
- bd1788051b02 15.0 landed
-
Move the shared memory size calculation to its own function
- 0bd305ee1d42 15.0 landed
-
Add new GUC, max_worker_processes, limiting number of bgworkers.
- 6bc8ef0b7f1f 9.4.0 cited