Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-03-15T03:20:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes: >> It feels a bit like unpredictable magic to have "DEFAULT" mean one >> thing and omitted columns mean something else. > > Agreed. The current code behaves that way, but I think that's > indisputably a bug not behavior we want to keep. I'm not entirely convinced that's a bug. Both behaviors seem useful, and there has to be some way to specify each one. But I just work here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix postgres_fdw's issues with inconsistent interpretation of data values.
- cc3f281ffb0a 9.3.0 cited