Re: Observations in Parallel Append
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-01-04T03:36:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- 0001-Code-review-for-Parallel-Append.patch (application/octet-stream) patch 0001
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > Attached, please find the patch which fixes this issue (Thanks to > Dilip for helping me in identifying the above case and fix). I have > also modified the comment atop function > choose_next_subplan_for_worker() as discussed above. The change to > remove unnecessary inclusion of spin.h is still in a separate patch as > posted above. Here's a combined patch with some cosmetic changes which I will commit if it looks OK to you. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Code review for Parallel Append.
- c75939561776 11.0 landed