Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Cc: torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Étienne BERSAC <etienne.bersac@dalibo.com>, ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com, rafaelthca@gmail.com, jian.universality@gmail.com
Date: 2024-03-04T18:19:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
ecpg: Catch zero-length Unicode identifiers correctly
- a18b6d2dc288 15.0 cited
-
Improve warning message in pg_signal_backend()
- 7fa945b857cc 15.0 cited
-
Add assert to ensure that page locks don't participate in deadlock cycle.
- 72e78d831ab5 13.0 cited
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 10:46 AM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote: > If I can rephrase this idea: it's basically "delay this interrupt > until inline to the next ExecProcNode execution". Yes, but it's not just that. It also means that the code which would handle the interrupt doesn't need to be called at every ExecProcNode. Only when the interrupt actually arrives do we enable the code that handles it. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com