Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Cc: torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Étienne BERSAC <etienne.bersac@dalibo.com>, ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com, rafaelthca@gmail.com, jian.universality@gmail.com
Date: 2024-03-04T18:19:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. ecpg: Catch zero-length Unicode identifiers correctly

  2. Improve warning message in pg_signal_backend()

  3. Add assert to ensure that page locks don't participate in deadlock cycle.

On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 10:46 AM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I can rephrase this idea: it's basically "delay this interrupt
> until inline to the next ExecProcNode execution".

Yes, but it's not just that. It also means that the code which would
handle the interrupt doesn't need to be called at every ExecProcNode.
Only when the interrupt actually arrives do we enable the code that
handles it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com