Horton

Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d.ivanov@postgrespro.ru>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Date: 2016-12-23T12:37:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I agree.  Patch attached, just removing the GUC and a fairly minimal
>> amount of the supporting infrastructure.
>
> +1 to removing the sql_inheritance GUC.  The patch looks good to me.

Great, committed.  I realize just now that I forgot to credit anyone
as a reviewer, but hopefully nobody's going to mind that too much
considering this is a purely mechanical patch I wrote in 20 minutes.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Replace enum InhOption with simple boolean.

  2. Remove sql_inheritance GUC.