Horton

Re: Use nanosleep(2) in pg_usleep, if available?

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-03-12T17:17:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:13 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> (I'm not sure what I think about which behavior is really more
> desirable.  We can debate that if there's actually a plausible
> choice to be made, which seems to depend on Windows.)

Yeah, that's a fair question.  My motivation for asking was that I
sometimes try to insert sleeps when debugging things, and they don't
actually sleep, because they get interrupted.  That's not dispositive,
though.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Use nanosleep() to implement pg_usleep().