Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au> wrote:
> Trying again with the attachments; the archiver only seemed to see the first
> patch despite all three being attached. Including patches inline; if you
> want 'em prettier, see:
>
>   https://github.com/ringerc/postgres/tree/sequence_documentation_fixes
>
>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Make sure you can't read through mvcc.sgml without
>  realising that not everything is MVCC.
>

The first of these three patches looks good to me, so I committed it.
I am not convinced that the others are ready to go in.  AFAICS, there
hasn't been any discussion of whether a list of non-transactional
features would be a useful thing to have, or if so where it should be
located in the docs and what should go into it.  I'm not necessarily
opposed to adding something, but I think it needs some actual
discussion before we commit anything.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company