Re: backup manifests
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Try to avoid compiler warnings in optimized builds.
- 05021a2c0cd2 13.0 landed
-
Fix option related issues in pg_verifybackup.
- 0a89e93bfaa6 13.0 landed
-
Add index term for backup manifest in documentation.
- 4db819ba4039 13.0 landed
-
Code review for backup manifest.
- a2ac73e7be7a 13.0 landed
-
Document the backup manifest file format.
- 149f2ae88ab0 13.0 landed
-
Fix typo in pg_validatebackup documentation.
- c4f82a779d26 13.0 landed
-
Exclude backup_manifest file that existed in database, from BASE_BACKUP.
- 1ec50a81ec0a 13.0 landed
-
Msys2 tweaks for pg_validatebackup corruption test
- c3e4cbaab936 13.0 landed
-
Fix resource management bug with replication=database.
- 3e0d80fd8d3d 13.0 cited
-
Be more careful about time_t vs. pg_time_t in basebackup.c.
- db1531cae009 13.0 cited
-
pg_validatebackup: Fix 'make clean' to remove tmp_check.
- 9f8f881caa0f 13.0 landed
-
pg_validatebackup: Also use perl2host in TAP tests.
- 460314db08e8 13.0 landed
-
Generate backup manifests for base backups, and validate them.
- 0d8c9c1210c4 13.0 landed
-
Add checksum helper functions.
- c12e43a2e0d4 13.0 landed
-
pg_waldump: Add a --quiet option.
- ac44367efbef 13.0 landed
-
Catversion bump for b9b408c48724
- afb5465e0cfc 13.0 cited
-
pg_basebackup: Refactor code for reading COPY and tar data.
- 431ba7bebf13 13.0 landed
-
Use a ResourceOwner to track buffer pins in all cases.
- 3cb646264e8c 12.0 cited
-
Use ARMv8 CRC instructions where available.
- f044d71e331d 11.0 cited
-
Logical replication support for initial data copy
- 7c4f52409a8c 10.0 cited
-
Use Intel SSE 4.2 CRC instructions where available.
- 3dc2d62d0486 9.5.0 cited
-
Switch to CRC-32C in WAL and other places.
- 5028f22f6eb0 9.5.0 cited
-
Remove support for 64-bit CRC.
- 404bc51cde9d 9.5.0 cited
-
Change CRCs in WAL records from 64bit to 32bit for performance reasons.
- 21fda22ec46d 8.1.0 cited
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:24 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > Between those two, I would use "pg_validatebackup" if there's a fair chance it > > will end up doing the pg_waldump check. Otherwise, I would use > > "pg_validatemanifest". > > +1. I guess I'd like to be clear here that I have no fundamental disagreement with taking this tool in any direction that people would like it to go. For me it's just a question of timing. Feature freeze is now a week or so away, and nothing complicated is going to get done in that time. If we can all agree on something simple based on Andres's recent proposal, cool, but I'm not yet sure that will be the case, so what's plan B? We could decide that what I have here is just too little to be a viable facility on its own, but I think Stephen is the only one taking that position. We could release it as pg_validatemanifest with a plan to rename it if other backup-related checks are added later. We could release it as pg_validatebackup with the idea to avoid having to rename it when more backup-related checks are added later, but with a greater possibility of confusion in the meantime and no hard guarantee that anyone will actually develop such checks. We could put it in to pg_checksums, but I think that's really backing ourselves into a corner: if backup validation develops other checks that are not checksum-related, what then? I'd much rather gamble on keeping things together by topic (backup) than technology used internally (checksum). Putting it into pg_basebackup is another option, and would avoid that problem, but it's not my preferred option, because as I noted before, I think the command-line options will get confusing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company