Re: Parallel seq. plan is not coming against inheritance or partition table
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2017-03-14T18:41:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed, so I have rebased your patch and passed heap_pages as -1 for > index_only scans as discussed. Also, Rafia has tested with attached > patch that parallel index and parallel index only scans are picked for > TPC-H queries. I have also reviewed and tested your changes with > respect to problem reported and found that it works as expected. So, > I think we can go ahead with attached patch unless you see some > problem with the changes I have made. OK, committed with a little more wordsmithing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Fix regression in parallel planning against inheritance tables.
- 2609e91fcf9d 10.0 landed
-
Replace min_parallel_relation_size with two new GUCs.
- 51ee6f3160d2 10.0 cited