Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com>
Date: 2024-07-24T18:47:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:45 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > There's a qualitative difference between a collation update which can > break your PKs and FKs, and a ctype update which definitely will not. I don't think that's true. All you need is a unique index on UPPER(somecol). -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com