Horton

Re: Parallel Index Scans

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed.90@gmail.com>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2016-12-23T12:08:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 1:35 AM, tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> In addition to that, we  run the sqlsmith against PG v10+PIS (parallel index
> scan) patches and found a crash  but that is coming on plain  PG v10
> (without applying any patches) as well

So why are you reporting it here rather than on a separate thread?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Replace min_parallel_relation_size with two new GUCs.

  2. Factor out logic for computing number of parallel workers.

  3. Support condition variables.

  4. Allow parallel custom and foreign scans.

  5. Add a C API for parallel heap scans.