Re: suggest to rename enable_incrementalsort
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-06-22T16:17:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:22 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > I think the big problem is that, without the extra underscore, it reads > as increment-alsort. ;-) I know you're joking, but I think there's a serious issue here. We often both omit word separators and also abbreviate, and I doubt that the meaning is always obvious to people whose first language is Japanese or Russian or something. The only human language other than English in which I have any competence at all is Spanish, and if somebody speaks Spanish to me the way that it's explained in a textbook, I can understand it fairly well, especially if we're talking about the kinds of topics that textbooks discuss rather than technical stuff. But as soon as you start to use abbreviations or idioms, you're going to lose me. Without a doubt, the best solution to this problem would be for me to have better Spanish, but in the absence of that, on those occasions when I need to communicate in Spanish, I sure do like it when people are willing and able to make that as easy for me as they can. I suspect other people have similar experiences. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Rename enable_incrementalsort for clarity
- e61225ffab3f 14.0 landed
- 94e454cddfba 13.0 landed