Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-05-11T03:25:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I still don't think, as commented upon by Tom and me upthread, that we
> want this feature in the current form.

Was this concern ever addressed, or did the patch just get committed anyway?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Finish reverting "recheck_on_update" patch.