Horton

Re: VACUUM PARALLEL option vs. max_parallel_maintenance_workers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-10-05T02:19:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 7:03 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> But the same is true for the 'Create Index' operation as well where we
> follow the same thing. We will use the number of workers as specified
> in reloption (parallel_workers) which is then limited by
> max_parallel_maintenance_workers.

Well, that seems pretty weird to me too, but surely we want them both
to be consistent.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Change the docs for PARALLEL option of Vacuum.