Re: documentation structure

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-20T14:32:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. docs: Consistently use <optional> to indicate optional parameters

  2. docs: Consolidate into new "WAL for Extensions" chapter.

  3. freespace: Don't return blocks past the end of the main fork.

  4. docs: Merge separate chapters on built-in index AMs into one.

  5. docs: Demote "Monitoring Disk Usage" from chapter to section.

  6. doc: move system views section to its own chapter

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 5:40 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> I also disagree that chapters 4 to 6 are a continuation of the tutorial.
> Or at least, they shouldn't be.
> When I am looking for a documentation reference on something like
> security considerations of SECURITY DEFINER functions, my first
> impulse is to look in chapter 5 (Data Definition) or in chapter 38
> (Extending SQL), and I am surprised to find it discussed in the
> SQL reference of CREATE FUNCTION.

I looked at this a bit more closely. There's actually a lot of
detailed technical information in chapters 4 and 5, but chapter 6 is
extremely short and mostly recapitulates chapter 2.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com