Horton

Re: libpq compression (part 3)

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs@instructure.com>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-01-12T21:11:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 4:02 PM Jacob Burroughs
<jburroughs@instructure.com> wrote:
> > I wonder if we could use "upstream" and "downstream" to be clearer? Or
> > some other terminology?
>
> What about `send` and `receive`?

I think that would definitely be better than "compress" and
"decompress," but I was worried that it might be unclear to the user
whether the parameter that they specified was from the point of view
of the client or the server. Perhaps that's a dumb thing to worry
about, though.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com