Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2014-11-12T21:10:56Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> If REINDEX cannot work without an exclusive lock, we should invent some
> other qualifier, like WITH FEWER LOCKS.

What he said.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

Prevent reindex of invalid indexes on TOAST tables
- 8bca5f93547c 12.3 landed
- 61d7c7bce368 13.0 landed
Rework handling of invalid indexes with REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
- a6dcf9df4d91 12.0 landed
Split builtins.h to a new header ruleutils.h
- 7b1c2a0f2066 9.5.0 cited