Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya.himanshu@gmail.com>,
Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2023-03-23T19:06:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- 0001-amcheck-Tighten-up-validation-of-redirect-line-point.patch (application/octet-stream) patch 0001
- 0002-amcheck-Generalize-one-of-the-recently-added-update-.patch (application/octet-stream) patch 0002
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 1:34 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, let me spend some more time on this and I'll post a patch (or > patches) in a bit. All right, here are some more fixups. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
amcheck: Generalize one of the recently-added update chain checks.
- c87aff065c33 16.0 landed
-
amcheck: Tighten up validation of redirect line pointers.
- 80d5e3a61551 16.0 landed
-
amcheck: Fix verify_heapam for tuples where xmin or xmax is 0.
- 8fd5aa76c367 14.8 landed
- 701ec5557968 15.3 landed
- e88754a1965c 16.0 landed
-
amcheck: Fix a few bugs in new update chain validation.
- 949e2e7c4f68 16.0 landed
-
Fix new test case to work on (some?) big-endian architectures.
- c75a623304bc 16.0 landed
-
Don't test HEAP_XMAX_INVALID when freezing xmax.
- 02d647bbf057 16.0 landed