Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Manuel Rigger <rigger.manuel@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-07-08T15:03:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:02 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:32 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > That said, I'm not sure I see the use case for an ALTER TABLE .. DROP
> > COLUMN command that turns a partitioned table (with existing partitions
> > containing data) into one non-partitioned table with all data minus the
> > partitioning column(s).
>
> I think it would be useful to have "ALTER TABLE blah NOT PARTITIONED" but I

...hit send too soon, and also, I don't think anyone will be very
happy if they get that behavior as a side effect of a DROP statement,
mostly because it could take an extremely long time to execute.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



Commits

  1. Make pg_upgrade's test.sh less chatty.

  2. Install dependencies to prevent dropping partition key columns.