Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia@taobao.com>, "Cai, Le" <le.cai@alibaba-inc.com>, 张广舟(明虚) <guangzhou.zgz@alibaba-inc.com>, 赵殿奎 <diankui.zdk@alibaba-inc.com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong.xsc@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: 2019-10-28T16:29:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
PageAddItemExtended(): Add LP_UNUSED assertion.
- 30aaab26e521 14.0 cited
-
Remove temporary files after backend crash
- cd91de0d1795 14.0 cited
-
Fix comment in indexing.c
- 9fd2952cf492 14.0 cited
-
Fix failure to ignore leftover temp tables after a server crash.
- 6919b7e32947 9.3.0 cited
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 9:48 AM Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > Logically it may be good decision. But piratically support of parallel > access to GTT requires just accessing their data through shared buffer. > But in case of local temp tables we need also need to some how share > table's metadata between parallel workers. It seems to be much more > complicated if ever possible. Why? The backends all share a snapshot, and can load whatever they need from the system catalogs. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company