Horton

Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-03-14T12:12:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:22 AM Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1- Even though I expect both the patch and HEAD behave similarly in case of small data (case 1: 100 bytes), the patch runs slightly slower than HEAD.

I wonder why this happens. It seems like maybe something that could be fixed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. Avoid needless large memcpys in libpq socket writing