Re: why can't plpgsql return a row-expression?
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Asif Rehman <asifr.rehman@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-12-06T19:04:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm against putting I/O coercion semantics into tupconvert, period. Ever. > If plpgsql wants that behavior rather than something more consistent > with the rest of the system, it needs to implement it for itself. I'm sure that can be done. I don't think anyone is objecting to that, just trying to get useful behavior out of the system. Are you going to commit a stripped-down version of the patch? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company