Horton

Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres@piotr-stefaniak.me>
Date: 2017-06-17T17:41:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent
> code under src/tools/ in our main repo.  Is anyone really
> seriously against that?

Is it under the same license as everything else?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Manually un-break a few URLs that pgindent used to insist on splitting.

  2. Remove entab and associated detritus.

  3. Phase 3 of pgindent updates.

  4. Phase 2 of pgindent updates.

  5. Initial pgindent run with pg_bsd_indent version 2.0.

  6. Adjust pgindent script to use pg_bsd_indent 2.0.

  7. Final pgindent run with old pg_bsd_indent (version 1.3).