Horton

Re: Instability in select_parallel regression test

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-03T03:57:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My guess is that if we apply the fix I suggested above, it'll be good
>> enough.  If that turns out not to be true, then I guess we'll have to
>> deal with that, but why not do the easy thing first?
>
> Okay, that is also a sensible approach.  Your patch looks good to me,
> though I have not tested it.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Notify bgworker registrant after freeing worker slot.

  2. Replace min_parallel_relation_size with two new GUCs.

  3. Allow parallel workers to execute subplans.