Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-08-25T14:19:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:23 AM tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/22 12:28 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > This patch needed to be rebased pretty extensively after commit
> > ce6b672e4455820a0348214be0da1a024c3f619f. Here is a new version.
> Thanks, Robert, I have retested this patch with my previous scenarios
> and things look good to me.

I read through this again and found a comment that needed to be
updated, so I did that, bumped catversion, and committed this.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix a bug in roles_is_member_of.

  2. docs: Fix up some out-of-date references to INHERIT/NOINHERIT.

  3. Allow grant-level control of role inheritance behavior.

  4. Make role grant system more consistent with other privileges.

  5. Document basebackup_to_shell.required_role.