Re: Sequence Access Method WIP

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-11-08T15:46:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Honestly, I am still not convinced that the centralized sequence server with
> no local caching is something we should be optimizing for as that one will
> suffer from performance problems anyway. And it can ignore the last_value
> input from postgres if it choses to, so it's not like the currently proposed
> patch forbids implementation of such AMs.

I can buy that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Commits

  1. Add missing gss option to msvc config template