Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-11-08T15:46:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Honestly, I am still not convinced that the centralized sequence server with > no local caching is something we should be optimizing for as that one will > suffer from performance problems anyway. And it can ignore the last_value > input from postgres if it choses to, so it's not like the currently proposed > patch forbids implementation of such AMs. I can buy that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Add missing gss option to msvc config template
- 3063e7a84026 9.6.0 cited