Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, "Mr. Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@gentoo.org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-04T12:22:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix nested PlaceHolderVar expressions that appear only in targetlists.
- ceaf5052c6a7 8.4.9 cited
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > OK, here is a patch that adds a -C option to the postmaster so any > config variable can be dumped, even while the server is running (there > is no security check because we don't have a user name at this point), > e.g.: > > postgres -D /pg_upgrade/tmp -C data_directory > /u/pg/data It seems both ugly and unnecessary to declare dump_config_variable as char[MAXPGPATH]. MAXPGPATH doesn't seem like the right length for a buffer intended to hold a GUC name, but in fact I don't think you need a buffer at all. I think you can just declare it as char * and say dump_config_variable = optarg. getopt() doesn't overwrite the input argument vector, does it? Also, I think you should remove this comment: + /* This allows anyone to read super-user config values. */ It allows anyone to read super-user config values *who can already read postgresql.conf*. Duh. > It also modifies pg_ctl to use this feature. It works fine for pg_ctl > -w start/stop with a config-only directory, so this is certainly in the > right direction. You can also use pg_ctl -o '--data_directory=/abc' and > it will be understood: > > pg_ctl -o '--data_directory=/u/pg/data' -D tmp start > > If you used --data_directory to start the server, you will need to use > --data_directory to stop it, which seems reasonable. Yep. I think that when adjust_data_dir() changes pg_data it probably needs to call canonicalize_path() on the new value. > Patch attached. This was much simpler than I thought. :-) Yes, this looks pretty simple. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company