Horton

Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, destrex271@gmail.com, Rafael Thofehrn Castro <rafaelthca@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-03-31T19:24:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. ecpg: Catch zero-length Unicode identifiers correctly

  2. Improve warning message in pg_signal_backend()

  3. Add assert to ensure that page locks don't participate in deadlock cycle.

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 8:40 AM torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> Rebased it again.

Hi,

I apologize for not having noticed this thread sooner. I just became
aware of it as a result of a discussion in the hacking Discord server.
I think this has got a lot over overlap with the progressive EXPLAIN
patch from Rafael Castro, which I have been reviewing, but I am not
sure why we have two different patch sets here. Why is that?

Thanks,

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com