Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-09-20T15:47:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9/19/16 2:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I suggest that we make it part of bgw_flags, but use a bitmask for it, >> like this: >> >> #define BGWORKER_CLASS_MASK 0x00f0 >> #define BGWORKER_CLASS_PARALLEL 0x0010 >> /* add additional bgworker classes here */ > > Unless we have a mechanism that makes use of this somehow, this attempt > at categorizing might be premature. My main reason for wanting is that I suspect there will be a similar desire to limit the number of replication workers at some point. However, that could be wrong. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company