Re: alter table only ... drop constraint broken in HEAD

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-10T03:48:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Avoid having two copies of the HOT-chain search logic.

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So i just picked up the non-inherited constraints patch and quickly
>> ran into the same problem and found this thread.
>>
>> I think it makes sense to hold off on this patch until these issues
>> are resolved. Because we really do need to test the cases when adding
>> or removing child tables that have constraints with the same name as
>> non-inherited parent tables. And I'm not sure what will happen in
>> these cases once these issues are resolved.
>
> Doesn't someone just need to commit Roberts patch?

Yeah, I've just been mostly AFK for ~53 hours.  It's committed now.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company