Re: alter table only ... drop constraint broken in HEAD
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-10T03:48:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Avoid having two copies of the HOT-chain search logic.
- 4da99ea4231e 9.2.0 cited
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote: >> So i just picked up the non-inherited constraints patch and quickly >> ran into the same problem and found this thread. >> >> I think it makes sense to hold off on this patch until these issues >> are resolved. Because we really do need to test the cases when adding >> or removing child tables that have constraints with the same name as >> non-inherited parent tables. And I'm not sure what will happen in >> these cases once these issues are resolved. > > Doesn't someone just need to commit Roberts patch? Yeah, I've just been mostly AFK for ~53 hours. It's committed now. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company