Re: block-level incremental backup
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>,
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>,
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-03T12:59:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Don't call data type input functions in GUC check hooks
- 21f428ebde39 12.0 cited
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 3:41 PM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote: > Are we using any tar library in pg_basebackup.c? We already have the capability > in pg_basebackup to do that. I think pg_basebackup is using homebrew code to generate tar files, but I'm reluctant to do that for reading tar files. For generating a file, you can always emit the newest and "best" tar format, but for reading a file, you probably want to be prepared for older or cruftier variants. Maybe not -- I'm not super-familiar with the tar on-disk format. But I think there must be a reason why tar libraries exist, and I don't want to write a new one. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company