Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-02-28T15:27:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Could we name this "postgresql_fdw" instead? We already have several
> ${productname}_fdw out there, and I don't want to get in the business of
> having to guess variant spellings.
If you don't like variant spellings, having anything to do with
PostgreSQL, aka Postgres, and usually discussed on the pgsql-* mailing
lists, is probably a bad idea.
Go Postgre!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company