Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>, Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>, "Andrew Dunstan *EXTERN*" <andrew@dunslane.net>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-11-04T18:31:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> Maybe there's a better term than "running", like "in progress" or >> something of that sort. > > "active"? +1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company