Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-25T17:59:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > I tried to do that. So, attached are two patches. > > 1. Fix for ExecInitPartitionInfo to use the right RT index to pass to > InitResultRelInfo > > 2. v5 of the patch to fix the bug of foreign partitions > > Thoughts? Are you splitting this into 2 patches here because there are 2 separate issues? If so, what are those issues? There seem to be a bunch of interrelated changes here but I haven't seen a clear explanation of which ones are needed for which reasons. I agree that fixing ExecInitPartitionInfo to use the right RT index in the first place sounds like a better idea than trying to piece together which RT index we should be using after-the-fact, but I need to better understand what problems we're trying to fix here before I can be sure if that's the strategy I want to endorse... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Remove now-unnecessary cast.
- a365f52d5831 11.0 landed
-
Fix interaction of foreign tuple routing with remote triggers.
- 37a3058bc7c8 11.0 landed