Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-11-24T14:45:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 9:37 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > My mental model is that "tuple" (in the narrow context of heap vacuum) > is the variable-size on-disk representation of a row in a page; "line > pointer" is the fixed-size struct at the bottom of each page that > contains location, size and flags of a tuple: struct ItemIdData. The > TID is the address of a line pointer -- an ItemPointerData. > > What is an item? Is an item the same as a line pointer? That seems > confusing. I think "item" means the tuple as a whole. In that light, > using the term TID for some of the things that the patch renames to > "item" seems more appropriate. Hmm. I think in my model an item and an item pointer and a line pointer are all the same thing, but a TID is different. When I talk about a TID, I mean the location of an item pointer, not its contents. So a TID is what tells me that I want block 5 and the 4th slot in the item pointer array. The item pointer tells me that the associate tuple is at a certain position in the page and has a certain length. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
vacuumlazy.c: fix remaining "dead tuple" references.
- 4bdfe6855901 15.0 landed
-
vacuumlazy.c: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items.
- 4f8d9d121795 15.0 landed
-
Remove tupgone special case from vacuumlazy.c.
- 8523492d4e34 14.0 cited
-
Standardize ItemIdData terminology.
- ae7291acbc5a 12.0 cited