Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>

Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2021-11-24T13:49:15Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 7:48 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it's more consistent if we change it to one side. I prefer "dead items".

I feel like "items" is quite a generic word, so I think I would prefer
TIDs. But it's probably not a big deal.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

vacuumlazy.c: fix remaining "dead tuple" references.
- 4bdfe6855901 15.0 landed
vacuumlazy.c: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items.
- 4f8d9d121795 15.0 landed
Remove tupgone special case from vacuumlazy.c.
- 8523492d4e34 14.0 cited
Standardize ItemIdData terminology.
- ae7291acbc5a 12.0 cited