Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-03-16T14:08:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Try to avoid running with a full fsync request queue.

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:46:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> > I agree with you that some worst case performance tests should be
>> > done. Could you please say what you think the worst cases would be, so
>> > those can be tested? That would avoid wasting time or getting anything
>> > backwards.
>>
>> I've thought about this some and here's what I've come up with so far:
>
> I question whether we are in a position to do the testing necessary to
> commit this for 9.2.

Is anyone even working on testing it?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company