Re: Negotiating the SCRAM channel binding type
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-08-07T09:02:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > Well, it'd be useless for users, there is no reason to switch off channel > binding if both the client and server support it. It might not add any > security you care about, but it won't do any harm either. The > non-channel-binding codepath is still exercised with non-SSL connections. Is that true? What if it makes a connection fail that you wanted to succeed? Suppose we discover a bug that makes connections using channel binding fail on Thursdays. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Remove support for tls-unique channel binding.
- 1b7378b3d689 11.0 landed
- 77291139c7c1 12.0 landed