Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Date: 2017-03-27T14:40:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/03/10 9:10, Amit Langote wrote: >> On 2017/03/09 23:25, Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Amit Langote wrote: >>>> I updated the patch. Now it's reduced to simply removing the check in >>>> transformInsertStmt() that prevented using *any* ON CONFLICT on >>>> partitioned tables at all. >>> >>> This patch no longer applies. >> >> Rebased patch is attached. > > Oops, really attached this time, Committed with a bit of wordsmithing of the documentation. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Revert "Allow ON CONFLICT .. DO NOTHING on a partitioned table."
- f05230752d53 10.0 landed
-
Allow ON CONFLICT .. DO NOTHING on a partitioned table.
- 8355a011a012 10.0 landed