Re: TopoSort() fix
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-30T17:45:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:44 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Well, there'd be an actual isolation test that they work ;-), if you > override the marking. Admittedly, one test case does not prove that > there's no way to crash the system, but that can be said of most > parts of Postgres. True. I'm just talking about what we can foresee. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Add an isolation test to exercise parallel-worker deadlock resolution.
- da9456d22a76 13.0 landed
-
Mark advisory-lock functions as parallel restricted, not parallel unsafe.
- 4886da832750 13.0 landed
-
Fix busted logic for parallel lock grouping in TopoSort().
- d933816c04c6 12.0 landed
- c3b613e1b0e5 9.6.15 landed
- af41ab50fdc5 10.10 landed
- 3420851a2c2d 13.0 landed
- 0dcb1c6c4874 11.5 landed