Re: On disable_cost
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>,
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-10-07T15:36:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:28 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > On 2024-Oct-03, Robert Haas wrote: > > One general thing to think about is that we really document very > > little about EXPLAIN. That might not be good, but we should consider > > whether it will look strange if we document a bunch of stuff about > > this and still don't talk about anything else. > > I completely agree that we document very little about EXPLAIN. However, > I disagree that we should continue to do so. I'd rather take the > opportunity to _add_ more details that we currently omit, and make the > documentation more complete. A short blurb about Disabled Nodes such as > the one Laurenz proposed seems an excellent way to start; we can add > more later, as people propose them. We don't have to stop here, and we > don't have to stay at statu quo re. other points. Sure, that all makes sense. I was just raising it as a point to consider. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Doc: add detail about EXPLAIN's "Disabled" property
- 84b8fccbe5c2 18.0 landed
-
Adjust EXPLAIN's output for disabled nodes
- 161320b4b960 18.0 landed
-
Fix order of parameters in a cost_sort call
- 87b6c3c0b703 18.0 landed
-
Show number of disabled nodes in EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.
- c01743aa4866 18.0 landed
-
Treat number of disabled nodes in a path as a separate cost metric.
- e22253467942 18.0 landed
-
Remove grotty use of disable_cost for TID scan plans.
- e4326fbc60c4 18.0 landed