Re: dsa_allocate() faliure
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Jakub Glapa <jakub.glapa@gmail.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Fabio Isabettini <fisabettini@voipfuture.com>,
Arne Roland <A.Roland@index.de>, Sand Stone <sand.m.stone@gmail.com>, Rick Otten <rottenwindfish@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-02-10T06:40:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
Attachments
- dsa-allocate-btree-init-soft.patch (application/octet-stream) patch
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 2:37 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > ... but why would it do that? I can reproduce cases where (for > example) FreePageManagerPutInternal() returns 179, and then > FreePageManagerLargestContiguous() returns 179, but then after > FreePageBtreeCleanup() it returns 178. At that point FreePageDump() > says: > > btree depth 1: > 77@0 l: 27(1) 78(178) > freelists: > 1: 27 > 129: 78(178) > > But at first glance it shouldn't be allocating pages, because it just > does consolidation to try to convert to singleton format, and then it > does recycle list cleanup using soft=true so that no allocation of > btree pages should occur. I think I see what's happening. At the moment the problem occurs, there is no btree - there is only a singleton range. So FreePageManagerInternal() takes the fpm->btree_depth == 0 branch and then ends up in the section with the comment /* Not contiguous; we need to initialize the btree. */. And that section, sadly, does not respect the 'soft' flag, so kaboom. Something like the attached might fix it. Boy, I love FreePageManagerDump! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Fix rare dsa_allocate() failures due to freepage.c corruption.
- 2cfdf24e7c68 10.8 landed
- b8386b0362b2 11.3 landed
- 7215efdc005e 12.0 landed
-
Release notes for 10.4, 9.6.9, 9.5.13, 9.4.18, 9.3.23.
- 83fcc6150206 10.4 cited
-
Fix crashes on plans with multiple Gather (Merge) nodes.
- fd7c0fa732d9 11.0 cited