Re: meson "experimental"?
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
From: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-04T15:28:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 16:25, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 2:41 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> > wrote: > > "Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is the only > > option for building PostgreSQL in Windows using Visual Something[*]. > > For other platforms, using Meson is currently experimental." > > Is it, though? I feel like we're beyond the experimental stage now. > I clearly missed the discussion in which it was decided to remove the old MSVC++ support from the tree (and am disappointed about that as I would have objected loudly). Having recently started testing Meson on Windows when I realised that change had been made, and having to update builds for pgAdmin and the Windows installers, I think it's clear it's far more experimental on that platform than it is on Linux at least. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
doc: Meson is not experimental on Windows
- 5afaba6297a8 18.0 landed
-
Fix names of "Visual Studio" and Meson in a documentation sentence.
- 75345f6985f2 17.0 landed
- e56ccc8e4204 18.0 landed
-
Fix name of "Visual Studio" in documentation.
- c175c9202d73 17.0 landed
- 3cffe7946c26 18.0 landed