Re: pgsql: Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possi
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
From: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2022-07-20T15:58:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 at 16:12, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > On 2022-Jul-20, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I'll try to do some research later today to identify anything else > >> we need to mark in plpgsql. I recall doing some work specifically > >> creating functions for pldebugger's use, but I'll need to dig. > > > I suppose you're probably thinking of commit 53ef6c40f1e7; that didn't > > expose functions directly, but through plpgsql_plugin_ptr. Maybe that > > one does need to be made PGDLLEXPORT, since currently it isn't. > > After some experimentation, it does not need to be marked: pldebugger > gets at that via find_rendezvous_variable(), so there is no need for > any explicit linkage at all between plpgsql.so and plugin_debugger.so. > > Along the way, I made a quick hack to get pldebugger to load into > v15/HEAD. It lacks #ifdef's which'd be needed so that it'd still > compile against older branches, but perhaps this'll save someone > some time. > Thanks Tom - I've pushed that patch with the relevant #ifdefs added. -- Dave Page PostgreSQL Core Team http://www.postgresql.org/
Commits
-
Add PGDLLEXPORTS to some plpgsql function declarations
- 1caf915ff31e 16.0 landed
-
Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possible
- 089480c07705 16.0 cited
-
Expose a few more PL/pgSQL functions to debugger plugins.
- 53ef6c40f1e7 15.0 cited