Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
To: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-03-17T13:32:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi David, On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 8:53 PM David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote: > > Hi Amit, > > On 2/25/20 3:42 AM, Amit Langote wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:16 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I added this patch to a commitfest > >> > >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/2467/ > >> > >> It is very interesting speedup and it is in good direction to JIT expressions > > > > Thank you. I was planning to do that myself. > > > > I will take a look at your other comments in a day or two. > > Do you know when you'll have chance to look at Pavel's comments? Sorry, I had forgotten about this. I will try to post an update by Thursday. -- Thank you, Amit
Commits
-
Rearrange validity checks for plpgsql "simple" expressions.
- fbc7a716084e 13.0 landed
-
Improve performance of "simple expressions" in PL/pgSQL.
- 8f59f6b9c037 13.0 landed
-
Ensure that plpgsql cleans up cleanly during parallel-worker exit.
- 4bfacc5a4411 9.5.22 landed
- deeda011b316 11.8 landed
- dd51b5696aa5 9.6.18 landed
- a54a87320782 12.3 landed
- 86e5badd22d9 13.0 landed
- 42d3649b58f4 10.13 landed