Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Rares Salcudean <rares.salcudean@takeofflabs.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-12T08:27:39Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 4:15 PM David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 18:53, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have looked at the patch. It seems right to make > > match_boolean_partition_clause() return PartClauseMatchStatus instead > > of bool. Didn't find anything to complain about. > > Thanks for having a look. I've just pushed roughly that patch with > just some additional comments. Thanks for taking care of this. Regards, Amit
Commits
-
Fix RANGE partition pruning with multiple boolean partition keys
- cfde23493938 13.0 landed
- 30a268ed2e29 12.0 landed
- 757f1baa8c13 11.5 landed