Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ?
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-01-28T15:28:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:18 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > In the pluggable-storage discussion, there was some talk of renaming > nodes/relation.h to avoid confusion with the new access/relation.h > header. I think this is a fine idea, not only because of that conflict > but because "relation.h" has never made a lot of sense as the file's > name. > > After a bit of thought, I propose "pathnodes.h" as the new name. > That fits in with the other major headers in that directory > (primnodes.h, parsenodes.h, plannodes.h, execnodes.h), and it seems > like a reasonable summary of what's in it. Admittedly, Path nodes > as such are barely a third of the file's bulk; but I don't see any > equally pithy way to describe the rest of it, unless something like > planner_data.h, which is pretty unmelodious. optnodes.h, as in optimization-related nodes? I like pathnodes.h too though. Thanks, Amit
Commits
-
Rename nodes/relation.h to nodes/pathnodes.h.
- fa2cf164aaf9 12.0 landed