Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions

Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-12-07T08:47:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 4:01 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:19 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > I have pushed this finally.
>>
> > I'll mark this commitfest entry as committed soon; please post the other
> > two patches you had in this series in a new thread.
>
> Will do, thanks.

While doing that, I noticed that I had missed updating at least one
comment which still says that permission checking is done off of the
range table.  Attached patch fixes that.

-- 
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. Add a test case for a316a3bc

  2. Correctly set userid of subquery relations' child rels

  3. Fix buggy recursion in flatten_rtes_walker().

  4. Remove some dead code in selfuncs.c

  5. Update outdated comment in ApplyRetrieveRule

  6. Rework query relation permission checking

  7. Generalize ri_RootToPartitionMap to use for non-partition children

  8. Stop accessing checkAsUser via RTE in some cases

  9. Add 'missing_ok' argument to build_attrmap_by_name